Canon iP4600 Inkjet Photo Printer
- Photo lab quality borderless 4 by 5 inch photo in approximately 20 seconds
- ChromaLife100 system delivers vibrant photos that last up to 300 years
- Maximum 9600 by 2400 dpi with microscopic droplets as small as 1 picoliter using FINE technology
- “Easy-PhotoPrint EX” software with enhanced “Auto Photo Fix” easily removes red eye
Product Description
Canon iP4600 inkjet photo printer is premium photo printer with individual ink tanks and built-in auto duplex.Manufacturer Product Description
Manufacturer Product Description Photo lab-quality 4 x 6 inch borderless prints in 20 seconds? Yes, you can do that, and much more. The new 5-color ink system – four dye-based inks and a pigment-based black ink – produces vivid colors and bold, black text. And Canon’s patented print head technology creates beautiful, long-lasting photos with resolution up to 9600 x 2400 color dpi. .caption { font-family: Verdana, Helvetica neue, Arial, serif; font-size: 10px; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; } ul.indent { list-style: inside disc; text-indent: 20px; } table.callout { font-family: Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, serif; margin: 10px; width: 250; } td.callout { height: 100 percent; background: #9DC4D8 url(http://images.amazon.com/images/G/01/electronics/detail-page/callout-bg.png) repeat-x; border-l… More >>
Canon iP4600 Inkjet Photo Printer
Like this post? Subscribe to RSS feed!
5 comments
Gerald Eads on December 20, 2009 at 2:12 am
You have GOT to be kidding – they load the cartridges with chips so aftermarket can’t counter the ridiculous prices of their replacement ink, AND in the face of a collapsing worldwide economy they RAISE prices – FIFTEEN BUX!!!!? I love Canon stuff, everybody, and I was going to buy this thing tonight. But here and now somebody else gets my business. Go ahead and fry, Canon. I’m gone.
Martini on December 20, 2009 at 4:25 am
I previously used the Canon i250 until the color ink stopped working. I thought the i4600 would be a better more efficient machinge. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
I frequently change from regular paper to photo paper and the procedure on the i4600 is cumbersome. Once it finally prints, the result is nice, but then, so was the i250.
Canon has goofed on this product, and I can’t recommend it.
Donald Wulbrecht on December 20, 2009 at 5:56 am
I am a a little mystified by the very high ratings given to computer printers. I bought the Pixma 4600 to replace the 4500. I buy this model because it does very few things– no card slots, built-in monitors, and wild claims of independence from computers. The single function printer is more reliable than multi-function printers, but still no paragon of problem-free service. The all-in-ones and feature laden single use printers I have owned in the past have all been kludgy, slow, noisy and unreliable. I used to think of myself as an exception, that I somehow got the infrequent lemon printer. But no, I can’t be unlucky for 20 years. Though this 4600 is inexpensive to start, I will be consistently ripped by expensive ink cartridges; I will have to keep lots on-hand because printer-caused work interruptions at 7 am are particularly frustrating. I will twiddle my thumbs while I wait for the printer to go through the noisy warmup, and after 9 months to a year I will begin getting inexplicable error messages that ask me to rummage around the printer, cancel jobs, and turn the printer off and then on again. I have owned Epson, HP, Lexmark, and Canon printers. I thought about Kodak, but somehow I don’t trust their claims either. And to the people who are happy about Canon customer service, I say good for you; you obviously talked to different reps than I did. At least Canon has someone you can talk to– anyone ever get a problem solved at the manufacturer’s web site? Price, too seems to be very subjective. Four years ago I bought a highly rated HP all-in-one for $400. Copying took forever, photo printing sucked, and scanning was a slow joke with no punch line. I was almost grateful when it broke down. I know that this review will not really help you decide on a printer, but the generally glowing reviews of others have not helped me choose a decent printer either.
W. Pool on December 20, 2009 at 7:45 am
Don’t use a printer that frequently, but so far this one does everything I need and expected.
Ariana Mcwilliams on December 20, 2009 at 8:22 am
My old Canon S-750 broke down after many years of high volume printing at my office. Decided to buy this Canon ip4600 after reading reviews and its stated speed for printing. Boy did I make a HUGE mistake. This has proved to be the worst printer I have ever had, and have had nothing but problems since day 1. First it didnt come with the needed USB cable. The setup took over 20 min, the ink cartridges are much smaller than the old ones, and much more costly. It tells you for printing documents to load the paper into the bottom tray, but it constantly jams up and never prints correctly…at times it will print 1 page worth of typing on 3 or 4 different pages wasting a lot of paper. It seems the only way I can SOMETIMES get this to print properly is if i sit there and load 1 sheet of paper in at a time, and even then its still printing incorrectly. So dont bother trying to print multiple copys of a page unless you plan to spend the excess time loading the sheets of paper in individually. this machine does print quickly when it works, but only after over a minute of loud noises and movements for the printer to “warmup” even if it has only been idle for 3 minutes. All in all this printer is a piece of garbage and I would not recoment it to anyone!