<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shure M97xE High-Performance Magnetic Phono Cartridge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.killdeal.info/shure-m97xe-high-performance-magnetic-phono-cartridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.killdeal.info/shure-m97xe-high-performance-magnetic-phono-cartridge/</link>
	<description>Your online resource for discount shopping codes and deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:52:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jwwoods</title>
		<link>http://www.killdeal.info/shure-m97xe-high-performance-magnetic-phono-cartridge/comment-page-1/#comment-31797</link>
		<dc:creator>jwwoods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 01:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killdeal.info/shure-m97xe-high-performance-magnetic-phono-cartridge#comment-31797</guid>
		<description>I compare this cartridge to a V-15 type 4.  At first I thought there was an audible difference.  But then I edited together segments from one song played on a Technics SL-1200 MK2 turntable alternating which cartridge was used. Then I had trouble telling them apart by sound alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I compare this cartridge to a V-15 type 4.  At first I thought there was an audible difference.  But then I edited together segments from one song played on a Technics SL-1200 MK2 turntable alternating which cartridge was used. Then I had trouble telling them apart by sound alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Bernuy</title>
		<link>http://www.killdeal.info/shure-m97xe-high-performance-magnetic-phono-cartridge/comment-page-1/#comment-31796</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Bernuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 00:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killdeal.info/shure-m97xe-high-performance-magnetic-phono-cartridge#comment-31796</guid>
		<description>I want to know if this phono cartridge is compatible with sansui turntable FR-D40, because many years ago I bought a phono cartridge shure 96-XE and it was great. I don&#039;t know it is the same or compatible model. 
&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for the answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to know if this phono cartridge is compatible with sansui turntable FR-D40, because many years ago I bought a phono cartridge shure 96-XE and it was great. I don&#8217;t know it is the same or compatible model.<br />
<br />Thanks for the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. L. Green</title>
		<link>http://www.killdeal.info/shure-m97xe-high-performance-magnetic-phono-cartridge/comment-page-1/#comment-31795</link>
		<dc:creator>D. L. Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killdeal.info/shure-m97xe-high-performance-magnetic-phono-cartridge#comment-31795</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not an audiophile but I think this cartridge is not as good as expected.  It is adequate for the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not an audiophile but I think this cartridge is not as good as expected.  It is adequate for the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.G.</title>
		<link>http://www.killdeal.info/shure-m97xe-high-performance-magnetic-phono-cartridge/comment-page-1/#comment-31794</link>
		<dc:creator>T.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killdeal.info/shure-m97xe-high-performance-magnetic-phono-cartridge#comment-31794</guid>
		<description>I had the (mis)fortune of living with an M97xE mounted on my Thorens TP16 tonearm for almost a year.  This is without a doubt the most boring, way-overly-polite, sleep-inducing cartridge I&#039;ve ever listened to.  It performs very well with chamber music, acoustic folk, easy listening, waltzes, and any music intended to be slow and polite (it does do pacing/rhythm/tempo well, but politely).  Pair it with a rock LP and you get a total mess... it still plays hard rock as if it were chamber music!
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The cartridge is a decent tracker, but decidedly middle-of-the-road in this department.  Like many cartridges with elliptical styli, it doesn&#039;t do so well toward the inner grooves of an LP.  Surface noise is also about average.  Because of the shape of the cartridge (almost no flat/square edges -- see picture at top of page), I found it extremely difficult to mount correctly on the tonearm.  Why Shure designs a cartridge with this ridiculous shape, I have no clue.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Overall, this cartridge is workable if you have no (and I repeat, NO) rock and roll records.  If you do, I&#039;d strongly suggest you look elsewhere -- consider the Audio-Technica 440ML or one of the Grados.  Actually, unless you&#039;re into a very restrained and polite sound (not to be confused with neutrality), I suggest you look elsewhere anyway.  This puppy was fine for awhile, but eventually I found myself losing interest in vinyl and turning to my CD player... not a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the (mis)fortune of living with an M97xE mounted on my Thorens TP16 tonearm for almost a year.  This is without a doubt the most boring, way-overly-polite, sleep-inducing cartridge I&#8217;ve ever listened to.  It performs very well with chamber music, acoustic folk, easy listening, waltzes, and any music intended to be slow and polite (it does do pacing/rhythm/tempo well, but politely).  Pair it with a rock LP and you get a total mess&#8230; it still plays hard rock as if it were chamber music!</p>
<p>The cartridge is a decent tracker, but decidedly middle-of-the-road in this department.  Like many cartridges with elliptical styli, it doesn&#8217;t do so well toward the inner grooves of an LP.  Surface noise is also about average.  Because of the shape of the cartridge (almost no flat/square edges &#8212; see picture at top of page), I found it extremely difficult to mount correctly on the tonearm.  Why Shure designs a cartridge with this ridiculous shape, I have no clue.</p>
<p>Overall, this cartridge is workable if you have no (and I repeat, NO) rock and roll records.  If you do, I&#8217;d strongly suggest you look elsewhere &#8212; consider the Audio-Technica 440ML or one of the Grados.  Actually, unless you&#8217;re into a very restrained and polite sound (not to be confused with neutrality), I suggest you look elsewhere anyway.  This puppy was fine for awhile, but eventually I found myself losing interest in vinyl and turning to my CD player&#8230; not a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.killdeal.info/shure-m97xe-high-performance-magnetic-phono-cartridge/comment-page-1/#comment-31793</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killdeal.info/shure-m97xe-high-performance-magnetic-phono-cartridge#comment-31793</guid>
		<description>Arrived with the needle broken off.  Can&#039;t prove it so I threw it away.  Don&#039;t recommend it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arrived with the needle broken off.  Can&#8217;t prove it so I threw it away.  Don&#8217;t recommend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

